Creators Lab RSVP

KASYP × Centre for Youth PolicyBali · 21 to 24 February 2027

Politics in the age of creators.

We are calling twenty people to one room in Bali: ten of Asia's best-known political creators, five elected officials, and five alumni and participants of the Konrad Adenauer School for Young Politicians. Three closed-door days, working side by side on how politics and the creator economy should meet.

10 creators5 elected officials5 KASYPers

Format
Three days, closed door
Room
Twenty, by invitation
Dates
21 to 24 February 2027
Venue
Bali, Indonesia
Illustrative policy text Clause 4 of 9

Rural Connectivity Fund

4.1 The Fund finances last-mile broadband in districts where fewer than 40 per cent of households have a fixed or mobile data connection.

4.2 Grants go to local operators on a matched basis. The operator contributes 30 per cent of capital costs.

4.3 Households below the poverty line receive a 24-month subsidy of up to 60 per cent of a basic data plan.

4.4 The Fund is financed by a 1.5 per cent levy on gross telecom revenue and expires after five years unless renewed by the legislature.

4.5 Progress is reported to Parliament annually, by district.

Policy-to-Content, run on illustrative text. Four ideas kept, four conditions lost, one claim the clause does not support. The lab asks where simplification became distortion.

The premise

Creators now do work that parties, journalists and intermediaries used to do.

Political communication in Asia is changing fast. Parties and young politicians compete for attention on platforms shaped by political influencers, independent creators, AI-generated content and falling trust in traditional institutions. Younger audiences increasingly meet politics through a creator, not a newspaper or a party broadcast.

That opens real room for participation and plain explanation. It also brings new risks: manipulation, opaque sponsorship, disinformation, polarisation and the slow erosion of accountability. Politicians lean on personal narrative and informal media relationships. Creators find themselves doing the work of reporters, editors and party intermediaries, often without the rules that used to come with it.

The central questionHow can political actors communicate effectively in the creator economy without undermining democratic credibility, and how can creators engage with politics without becoming instruments of political actors?

It is not

A course that teaches politicians to become influencers, or one that teaches creators to cover politics.

It is

A structured space where both groups challenge each other's assumptions, see each other's pressures, and work out democratic standards for the creator economy together.

The lab sets out to

  • Build understanding between young political practitioners and the creators who interpret politics for online audiences.
  • Examine how trust, reach, authenticity and accountability work when communication runs through platforms.
  • Find practical ways to make policy understandable without distorting what it says.
  • Test responses to disinformation, AI-generated content, leaks and other high-pressure moments.
  • Bring KASYP alumni back as experienced practitioners who help the next cohort learn.
  • Produce short, practical recommendations for responsible politician-creator engagement in Asia.

Who is in the room

Twenty people. Small on purpose.

Twenty keeps the talk candid, the teamwork real and the evenings worth staying up for. It also divides cleanly: five mixed teams of four, each with two creators, one elected official and one KASYPer.

Seating plan of the lab Ten creators, five elected officials and five KASYPers. The layout changes between a round table, five mixed teams of four and a plenary critique. Team ATeam BTeam C Team DTeam E Team presentations and structured critique

Creator Elected official KASYPer

SeatsGroupProfile
10Political creatorsSome of the best-known people making political content in Asia, from different countries and platforms, who explain, interpret and argue about public affairs for large audiences.
5Elected officialsServing elected politicians from across the region, balanced between government and opposition and across party systems.
5KASYPersAlumni and current participants of the Konrad Adenauer School for Young Politicians: campaign and party strategists, youth-wing leaders, policy practitioners and emerging political communicators.

Nobody comes to give a speech. Officials and KASYPers are participants throughout, working in mixed teams with creators and putting their own communication instincts up for critique.

  • Closed doorNon-attributable discussion, so people can be honest.
  • Practice before theoryReal cases, real policy material, timed simulations. Formal inputs stay short.
  • Mixed teamsCreators and politicians make the decisions together.
  • Regional rangeDifferent political systems and media environments in one room.
  • Time to talkInformal conversation is part of the design, not leftover time.

Why come

What each of the twenty takes home.

Three days with people you rarely get in one room, off the record, with nothing you have to post.

For creators

A closed room with people who hold office. See how party structures, coalitions and governing constraints shape what politicians say, and test your instincts on real policy against people who have to defend it.

For elected officials

Time with the people your voters actually watch. See how creators verify, frame and decide what to cover, and put your own communication up for honest critique, with nothing attributed.

For KASYPers

Hands-on exposure to the communication environment you increasingly have to work in, peers across the region, and a part in shaping how KASYP teaches political communication.

Covered
Return economy flights, three nights' hotel with breakfast, airport transfers and the full programme.
Asked of you
All three days, in the room. No content to produce, and nothing published without your consent.

Six themes

What the three days keep returning to.

Open a theme to see the questions on the table.

EcosystemPolitics in the creator economy

How political information now reaches younger voters, and where parties, politicians, journalists and creators each sit in the information ecosystem. Day one opens by mapping that landscape with the creators and KASYPers in the room.

Trust / reachTrust versus reach
  • When does simplification become manipulation?
  • Does outrage always outperform policy?
  • How much personality should a politician put online?
  • Can professionally managed communication still be authentic?
The relationshipThe politician-creator relationship

The practical pressures on both sides, and the grey areas between them:

Paid collaborationPrivileged accessExclusivesEndorsementsPolitical advertisingDisclosureEditorial independence

ExplainingMaking policy understandable

How legislation, budgets and technical policy can become public communication people actually follow, without losing essential context or creating false certainty.

Disinformation / AIDisinformation, AI and campaigns

Deepfakes, manipulated footage, AI-generated political content and election misinformation, and the hard problem of correcting a false claim after it has already spread.

Under pressureCommunication under pressure

How political practitioners and creators respond differently to leaks, protests, communal tension, reputational attacks and allegations that develop by the hour.

Signature exercises

Three exercises do most of the work.

Peer learning, live dilemmas, mixed-team production and structured critique. The value is in comparing how a politician and a creator read the same situation.

Policy-to-Content Challenge

Each mixed team receives a real policy document. The official or KASYPer has three minutes to explain why it matters politically. The creator then develops a 60 to 90 second public-facing content concept. The group examines what came across well, what was lost, and where simplification became distortion.

How Would You Handle This?

One dilemma goes to both groups. Creators decide how they would verify, frame and cover it. Officials and KASYPers decide how they would respond politically. Then the two sets of instincts and incentives are laid side by side.

Scenario from the concept note

The creator's desk

    The politician's desk

      Scenarios marked illustrative are examples written for this page. Cases for the lab are chosen to be regionally relevant, and one or two come from KASYP alumni's own campaigns.

      Political Communication Challenge

      Mixed teams receive a real local political or policy issue and several hours to understand it. Each team prepares three linked outputs. The plenary critique then traces what each actor prioritised, which audiences were assumed to care, and what disappeared between policy reality and online communication.

      Each step narrows. The critique asks what fell out at each one.

      Indicative programme

      Three days, from mapping the field to agreeing joint principles.

      Timed sessions, preparation materials and exercise instructions follow once cases and facilitators are confirmed.

      Day 1

      Politics meets the creator economy

      • Arrival and orientation
      • Political landscape mapping, creators and politicians together
      • Politics in the creator economy
      • Trust, credibility and authenticity
      • Informal networking dinner

      Day 2

      Communication under pressure

      • The politician-creator relationship
      • How Would You Handle This? scenarios
      • AI, disinformation and campaign response
      • Policy-to-Content Challenge
      • Closed-door evening discussion with a senior political communicator or journalist

      Day 3

      Political Communication Lab

      • Political Communication Challenge in mixed teams
      • Team presentations and structured critique
      • What politicians and creators misunderstand about each other
      • Joint principles and recommendations
      • Closing and next steps

      Roles in the room

      Everyone comes with a role, not just a seat.

      The audience's view
      Creators bring what people actually watch, share and believe, and what they scroll past.
      Case protagonists
      One or two officials or alumni bring a real campaign or communication dilemma for the group to take apart.
      Government and opposition
      Officials from different parties and political systems test whether conclusions travel.
      Practice mentors
      Experienced KASYP alumni support the mixed teams without turning into lecturers.
      Emerging-leader perspective
      A current KASYPer brings the experience of building recognition while their public profile is still taking shape.

      What leaves the room

      Short, practical and reusable.

      What stays internal and what is published is agreed with participants and KAS before the lab.

      • Joint principlesA short set of principles for responsible politician-creator engagement.
      • Scenario packA practical pack of dilemmas that future KASYP modules can reuse.
      • Content prototypesSelected policy-to-content concepts developed during the lab.
      • Learning noteA concise internal note on what it means for KASYP's political communication training.
      • Follow-up collaborationsPossible work between politicians and creators afterwards, under clear transparency and independence standards.

      Safeguards

      House rules for a room of politicians and creators.

      Active political practitioners and creators in one room need clear boundaries. Everyone agrees to these before arriving.

      • No content required. Nobody has to produce or publish anything during the programme.
      • No undisclosed promotion. No paid endorsement, and no access traded for favourable coverage.
      • Consent first. Cases and personal experiences are documented outside the room only with clear consent.
      • Non-attribution. Closed-door discussion stays unattributed unless participants agree otherwise.
      • Pluralism. Respect for different parties, political systems and national contexts.
      • Security awareness. Practices suited to people who work in sensitive political environments.

      Venue and dates

      Bali, Indonesia.
      21 to 24 February 2027.

      Arrive
      21 February
      Depart
      24 February
      Programme
      Three days, closed door
      Stay
      Three nights

      Participants travel in from across Asia and stay together for the full lab, so the evenings count as much as the sessions.

      Bali

      Land: Natural Earth 1:50m.

      The island

      Temples, terraces and evening dance.

      February falls in Bali's wet season, which usually means warm days and heavy afternoon showers. Pack light, and pack an umbrella.

      Rice planting in the shadow of Mount AgungBali's highest volcano, and its most sacred.Photo: Imadedana, CC BY-SA 4.0
      Pura Ulun Danu BeratanThe lake temple at Bedugul, in the central highlands.Photo: Anandajoti, CC BY-SA 4.0
      KecakThe chanting circle, usually performed at dusk.Photo: Yves Picq, CC BY-SA 3.0
      Pura Luhur UluwatuA split gate on the clifftop temple above the Indian Ocean.Photo: Anandajoti, CC BY-SA 4.0
      Jatiluwih rice terracesPart of the subak irrigation landscape, a UNESCO World Heritage site.Photo: Jorge Franganillo, CC BY 2.0
      LegongA classical court dance, read through the eyes and the fan.Photo: Yves Picq, CC BY-SA 3.0
      Canang sariThe small daily offering left at shrines, doorways and dashboards.Photo: Chainwit., CC BY 4.0

      RSVP

      You have been asked to be one of twenty.

      If an invitation reached you, reply below and we will send travel details, the preparation pack and the house rules to sign. Bali, 21 to 24 February 2027.

      Seats are by invitation only. Know someone who belongs in this room? Tell us about them.